Nvenc av1 quality. I suppose the question is HVEC vs AV1 vs H264.
Nvenc av1 quality Set target quality level (0 to 51, 0 means automatic) for constant quality mode in VBR NVIDIA GPUs ship with an on-chip hardware encoder and decoder unit often referred to as NVENC and NVDEC. But if ending up with large files is not a big issue for you, then NVENC is fine. NVENC h. I just learned about AV1, and I decided that it would be better than h265 for my needs. 265(HEVC) I dont see too much information for AV1 out in the wild. Kinda like watching YouTube at 720p on a 27 inch monitor. A suggestion regarding the API design: it would be great if all of the encoders/decoders information could be aligned behind a well-documented single function as much as possible so that application developers who don’t The AV1 results are impressive: the new Intel encoder scored 83 points at 3. 45x more I'm doing SVT-AV1 Preset 0,1,3,5,7,10,12 for Constant Quality 20-50RF, matching bitrates with x264/5 -Placebo. PSNR and VMAF are See more AV1 NVENC was the clear winner with faster compression speeds, comparable file size, and better quality. RF30 AV1 is comparable to RF24 265. Programming NVENC AMD recently updated its AMF H. Generally speaking, it is not recommended to change these parameters, as the built-in presets offer a good range of options for common uses. 14900K AV1 Encode (P3) 1-5 FPS RTX 4090 H. The quality of encoded video depends on various features in Intel QSV AV1 is only capable of 4:2:0 encoding. All will give the same video quality. That cpu h264 graph looks off. The benefits of AV1 are best used in unison with the multi-encoder design featured on the NVENC AV1 encoding using the exact same settings otherwise, took 9min 56s. improved through iterative GPU generations where it can be seen that early implementations of encoding with Nvidia’s NVENC, Recently, FFmpeg annonunced to support NVIDIA NVENC AV1 encoder, as well as offer better quality at lower bit rate and outperforming HEVC (H. This post showcases how CUDA-accelerated VMAF (VMAF-CUDA) enables VMAF scores to be calculated on NVIDIA GPUs. A boon to streamers, NVENC offloads compute-intensive encoding tasks from the CPU NVEnc-AV1 is 8 (eight) times faster than SVT-AV1 (see below). 265 (NVenc) encoder with all the other video options on their default settings. Isn't the whole point of AV1 to preserve visual quality while reducing file size? The NVENC AV1 does not do that. Yes you could get better if you used aomenc or something, but I don't have the time 😁 - I need 100+ fps That’s some great fps speeds the max I ever got with the A380 at 1080p 10 bit quality is 220fps. Table 2. Also at all points make sure you use p010le because it has a higher quality with a lower bitrate. 3) AMD HW AV1 vs AMD HW H. 5. 264 encoder with a new feature called Pre-Analysis, this feature boosts video quality equal to that of Nvidia's Turing and Ampere-based NVENC encoder. Then save it. I read that it doesnt really change the quality if you go below 14. )---FYI, this is a basic NVEnc H264 options setting for my GTX 1060 6G (Pascal) card. The software enhancements in SDK v13. So please watch in the highest quality pos “The video encoder in Turing GPUs has substantially improved quality and performance compared with Pascal. Comparing compression quality on QHD 1440p 60fps Overwatch gameplay using Neflix's VMAF. My system specs are below, but I have tried everything I can think of to ensure that the drivers are there, using both nVidia's Game Ready and Studio drivers. AV1 is the next generation of video encoding technology — 40% more efficient than the current AVC standard — and it will improve visual quality, and reduce bandwidth. The NVENC hardware takes YUV/RGB as input and generates an H. The quality of encoded video depends on various features in The NVENC hardware takes YUV/RGB as input and generates an H. This new performance headroom enables higher than ever image quality, including 8k. 0 supports NVENC/VCE transcoding In terms of quality, does Nvidia's Nvenc or Intel Arc's Encoder produce better quality using the AV1 codec? Nvidia states theirs is the best, is it true? It seems like the major changes are AV1 encoding support, and possibly multiple NVENC chips, allowing for up to 8K encoding, or more concurrent sessions (like to stream and local record at the same time in two different quality settings). There are 2 types of software developed, one is command line version that runs independently, (15) Video Encoders (AV1, VP8, VP9) (2) Full comparison between H. FastFlix is a GUI around those encoders (have to download them and link in settings page). Manually setting the encoder level from Automatic to 6. Quality vs. So please watch in the highest quality pos NVENC Low Level APIs for H. NVENC is the video encoder chip inside Nvidia GPUs, while AV1 is a video codec. AV1 makes sense for multi billion dollar companies like youtube and netflix where every bit of compression helps. Constrained quality: libaom-av1 also has a constrained quality (CQ) mode that will ensure that a constant quality is reached while keeping the bitrate below a specified However, if you have an RTX 40 Series GPU and have the NVIDIA NVENC AV1 video encoder enabled, a bitrate of 18,000 Kbps for 60 FPS at 4K resolution would still yield excellent video quality. Currently, the following codecs are supported: v h264_nvenc -preset slow output AV1 NVDEC HW decoding requires using -c:v av1: ⬇️All technical details will be down here⬇️This video was uploaded in 8K to force YouTube to use AV1 on their end. To quantify the quality improvements, we investigated peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and video multimethod assessment fusion (VMAF) scores for AV1 and H. 5mbps Intel AV1 ~= 6mbps Nvenc in FPS games. So please watch in the highest quality pos However, I keep seeing time and time again on YouTube that people are encoding their videos in Resolve with AV1 using NVENC. Pick one of the encodes you just made, to compare to the source. than a less efficient codec to achieve the same visual quality. Each of these used the H. It'll take longer, but you'll get a better quality-to-size ratio. Low latency tuning info, HQ: High quality tuning info ; Programming NVENC. x264 puts load only on CPU so you'd better have a really good CPU to get good quality AMF is the worst encoder in terms of quality since AMD doesn't really care about streaming/gaming For other codecs like HEVC and AV1, NVENC doesn't always have a lead but it is a solid choice across the board. Also CQ 0 is a special value, from the description: 0 means automatic. Made an Excel of the data and encode times, sizes, etc. Members Online. The NVENC plugin in FFMPEG supports the following codecs: h264_nvenc - H264 Encoder hevc_nvenc - HEVC Encoder av1_nvenc - AV1 Encoder The command lines in this document use h264_nvenc, and should be replaced by hevc_nvenc for HEVC encode and av1_nvenc for AV1 encode. Low Latency HQ is the default and provides the best balance of NVENC performance vs quality. VMAF score on 8th gen nvenc AV1 is actually pretty decent, good enough for my purposes anyway. Even when I decrease the CQ value (increasing quality), when I use NVENC anything below around CQ24 all has the same file size. Da Vinci Resolve supports AVC (H. SVT-AV1 achieves slightly higher scores in At the same bit rate, av1_nvenc has a higher VMAF score (higher is better) than libx265 with the medium preset. 13 votes, 11 comments. Since it simply uses the FFmpeg integration and exposes it to OBS Studio, including all the necessary zero-copy logic, you can switch your stream over, set some parameters, and get started with a higher quality stream Nvenc AV1 (RTX 4090) Nvenc AV1 (RTX 4090, 10 bit) QSV AV1 (Arc A770) QSV AV1 (Arc A770, 10 bit) file & reencoding as efficiently as possible later when you can afford the time so you can optimize for quality per bit. 1:1 HWACCEL Transcode without Scaling AV1 is still in development, and hopefully all encoder will support it in the future, but only SVT AV1 works through ffmpeg as of now for software encoders. This implies that both the reference frame and the distorted frame stay in video memory and can be input into VMAF AV1 - Royalty free compression standard offering better quality at lower bitrates than H264, supported only be a few streaming providers, check the streaming provider if unsure. NVENC in the The NVIDIA NVENC hardware encoder has a limited set of advanced encoder options. The newest codec supported in OBS Studio (standardised 2019), offers improved quality/file size over HEVC. is this the same now for av1? im using av1 and noticed huge differences in quality and storage, seems to take way less storage at the same I have tested video quality at the same bitrate 10000kbps, 2560x1080 in (OBS 20. 3. Nvidia NVENC (short for Nvidia Encoder) [1] is a feature in Nvidia graphics cards that performs video encoding, offloading this compute-intensive task from the CPU to a dedicated part of the GPU. Works well enough for me. QSVEnc - Works! NVEncC - Works! VCEEncC - Works! rav1e - can set mastering data and CLL via their CLI but not through ffmpeg. This is a tool I made and don't have a 4xxx card to test with so please let me know of any issues! This fundamental performance difference opens the doors for AV1 to support higher-quality video, increased throughput, and high dynamic range (HDR). NVENC can consume the raw video frame while NVDEC decodes the output frame into video memory. Don't forget to use synthetic film grain. They use CPU only while NVEnc uses the Nvidia graphics card encoding engine, NVENC. Full HD video 24fps. The consistency of CBR is excellent for transitions from low to high action scenes, and this ensures that the encoder can keep up even during these quick You can test your settings by encoding and watching short clips using HandBrake’s Preview feature. However, it takes significantly longer. Im streaming at 1080p 60 fps with nvenc cbr and want to record 1080p for youtube via cqp at the same time. Vulkan. 265 along with CQP to your desired level of quality for the recording. According to the paper “VMAF Reproducibility: Validating a Perceptual Practical Video Quality Metric” by Reza Rassool, after extensive subjective testing and correlating the results using VMAF, a score of 93 can optimally serve the majority of an audience. At higher resolutions like UHD 2160P, AV1 can outperform HEVC by a significant margin For high quality local recording one should use the best quality hardware encoder available (NVIDIA NVENC, AMD AMF, Intel QSV, Apple VT). 0 enable extending ultra-high quality (UHQ) mode to AV1 encoding. Just create your own. Snail I'd recommend judging your workflow's requirements first and take all factors into consideration prior to switching to a hardware-based encoding solution. This will start a “job”. The table below illustrates the results of converting the file using different Constant Quality options – all into 1080p video. I test graphics cards for Tom's Hardware and did some quality and performance comparisons with the Arc A380 GPU a couple of months back, and I'd love to be able to do a similar set of tests with RTX 4090 now that it's available. Handbrake will encode in AVC, HEVC and AV1 based on hardware encoders. I was using rigaya encoders for both. As for quality differences: They're all about the same. All with OBS, apples to apples - using the same encoder preset and the same game scene and CQP or bitrate target. 265) and AV1 codecs. The hardware encoder and hardware decoder are referred to as NVENC and NVDEC, respectively, in the rest of the document. High quality tuning info 1. Visual quality same. It seems to be as fast as the Nvidia HEVC encoder with comparable settings, which is remarkable, because AV1 claims to have a higher encoder complexity than AV1 just isn't good at high bitrate, very high quality encoding fullstop. SVTAV1 can be faster than x265, but I don't think it makes sense to use presets 8 and above unless it's a real-time application. Rav1e, my personal favorite software AV1 With AV1 I tend to end up at ~4000 kbps for grain-free 4K movies at that quality level :p Overall your approach has one big flaw: You target a bitrate when using CRF, which kinda kills the point of CRF: It targets a quality level and allocates But you need to finetune the settings suited for H264 referring to the NVEnc manual. NVENC Performance Test Setup. 265, and AV1 encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality. Very good file size to quality compared to h. AV1 requires more powerful hardware to decode, and it takes much longer time to decode than HEVC. Then open then properties menu, go to the bottom hamburger (triple horizontal line) menu, and select measure video quality. It has negligible performance penalties. After these encodes are out, I'll match bitrates with Intel QSV-AV1 to get a good comparison for us all! Team Green claims you can also get much better video quality using the NVENC unit inside RTX 40 series as opposed to competitors' hardware, but we're only getting a screenshot for comparison where Tl;dw SVT-AV1 preset 7 or 8 (afaik with the old version of SVT-AV1 that OBS currently ships) >>>>> Intel AV1 ~= x264 very slow >> Intel Quicksync > Nvenc >> AMF 3. The big advantage here is moreso that you are comparing a For YouTube, select Hardware (NVENC, AV1) if you have an RTX 40 Series GPU, or Hardware (NVENC, HEVC) otherwise. Even ignoring any quality differences (which I didn't really notice), NVENC supports reference frame invalidation which allows much better performance and image quality when recovering after a lost frame. (BTW, x264 and x265 are different encoders than NVEnc. If filesize/bitrate is not a concern for you, then go right ahead and use NVENC. Table 3. Separate from the CUDA cores, NVENC/NVDEC run encoding or decoding workloads without slowing the execution of graphics or CUDA workloads running at the same time. [2] [3]The encoder is supported in many livestreaming and Timo Rothenpieler merged the NVENC AV1 encoding support and summed it up as: The encoder seems to be trading blows with hevc_nvenc. I tested it in many games H. Across the video library tested, at the 10Mbps target bitrate, the NVIDIA NVENC HEVC and Aurora1 Subreddit for AV1 video codec. No way should it be losing to Nvenc. File size increased to 10. av1 software encoding on the same source. This means av1_nvenc provides “better quality” than libx265 Video Quality vs QP at Various Presets. AV1 demonstrates a 30% better compression ratio compared to HEVC and VP9. 265 is capped at ~20Mb/s NVENC AV1 is capped at ~30Mb/s. (Of course, corporate entities have licensing reasons to prefer AV1. AV1 quality selection on Twitch VOD. OBS will record for the same reason. It has become most important and widespread codec in the industry. 265 Nvenc will be the fastest, but the largest file size. Quality: Try 40 (larger number = smaller file size; too large can lower quality) e. Vulkan video decoding is a new specification for vendor-generic hardware accelerated video decoding. 265 there is a workaround. 1GB. Nvenc AV1 is better. libaom-av1 has a constant quality (CQ) mode (like CRF in x264 and x265) which will ensure that every frame gets the number of bits it deserves to achieve a certain (perceptual) quality level, rather than encoding each frame to meet a bit rate target. You i did some testing with 4k clips (raw quality) encoded to arc a380 qsv av1 and 4090 nvenc av1 vs hevc for both qsv and nvenc -- the average fps speed for av1 at best quality preset for both: nvenc 61. 264 I would need to lower quality to medium. 1 Encoder levels. Refer to the SDK release notes for information regarding the required driver The bitrates that youtube uses for AV1 are so low that the quality is usually even and sometimes arguably worse than the AVC and VP9 streams. Recommended quality settings. NVENC and NVDEC support the many important codecs for You can test your settings by encoding and watching short clips using HandBrake’s Preview feature. It can also add AVISynth/VapourSynth scripting. This makes AV1 encoding on Blackwell NVENC comparable to software AV1 encoding with ~3X throughput. That's a major AV1 feature and current AV1 encoders are not tuned to encode high frequency noise like film grain. At least for high motion scenes. H. 265 Encode 450+ FPS 14900K H. : H264; Profile: High or Main High enables AV1 can save up to 30% file size than HEVC for the same image quality. I would suggest streaming with CBR for streaming with H. Can I get the same results as cpu encoding, target being 10bit x265, with NVENC, for say a A% higher file size, but done at To get the most out of the AV1 codec, it seems like you need to turn the bitrate all the way down. They clearly chose to lower their server costs while keeping the same quality rather than Constant Quality. 0 on Ada GPUs for HEVC and AV1. 0 enable extending ultra-high quality Would sell the GPU and go for a 3080. Just think of it as an example. I was wondering if I would get better stream quality if I moved to av1 Reply reply nvenc av1 is superior to nvenc hevc. 5 fps and qsv 70 fps. One does not have to do any pixel-peeping to notice. HEVC is supported by GPU/CPU from It produces good quality and I've use that preset plenty. NVENC encoding performance in frames/second (fps) H. 265 always late reply: but welcome to the AV1 shit show where you get questionably equal quality as 265 at the cost of 3-4x longer encoding times. The user can choose higher emphasis level for the regions (s)he wants to encode with a higher quality. I suppose the question is HVEC vs AV1 vs H264. If that doesn't apply, AV1 quality or even support in the first place is not an important factor in your purchasing decision. With AV1 support for 10 bit is in the main branch which means there should not be a single client that can't play it. 265 has better image quality, better detalization and more clear image overall even at higher bitrates like 50000kbps. This is another huge bonus. You can start with the HEVC preset, change the encoder to the AV1 NVEnc encoder and then adjust the quality slider as desired. For higher compression, x265 is both more qualitative and more consistent. It was introduced with the Kepler-based GeForce 600 series in March 2012 (GT 610, GT620 and GT630 is Fermi Architecture). PSNR variations for x265 RF=26 and NvEnc RF=28, specifically I mean there are many improvements that have been made in NVENC and NVENC HQ should be equal quality compared to default x264 – Dr. OP VMAF-CUDA can be used during encoding. I found the quality will defer based on different videos but hevc_qsv was doing the job for me. 264 HEVC AV1 ⬇️All technical details will be down here⬇️This video was uploaded in 8K to force YouTube to use AV1 on their end. Figure 2. I've compared NVENC HEVC and NVENC AV1 on a 4090. Especially if you expect AV1 to be better by a margin in terms of say size, quality or speed. av1_qsv was the worst so settled with hevc_qsv as it is fast as well as giving good quality. In terms of quality at low bitrate cbr settings, it seems to In addition to giving streamers more control, this beta paves the way for future improvements such as new codec support, and experimenting with HEVC and AV1. Skip to main content. It would seem that the choice of preset makes only a minor difference to PSNR. However, according to the FFMPEG 7. The NVIDIA Encoder Interface exposes four different tuning info enums (high quality, low latency, ultra-low To make it an acceptable quality, I have to use higher bitrates compared to libx264. What are the correct settings for streaming? Is there anything we should be guided by when choosing these options? Is it a big diference betwenn P5 Slow Good Quality and P7 Slowest Best Quality when it comes to computer load (usage) during the stream? My PC specs: H. Moreover, NVENC quality has been largely improved allowing users to get more than twice the number of simultaneous encode sessions per NVENC on Turing and Ampere GPUs compared to previous generations, while maintaining similar encoding NVENC AV1, preset p4 (Ada GPUs) -c:v amf vce encoder quality h. 4 and higher. x264 quality was clearly superior. Right, and how one does go by doing that? Make sure all of your settings are what you wish them to be before saving a template. Compression Ratio. There are 2 types of software developed, one is command line version that runs independently, AV1 (Ada Lovelace or later) Each encode mode of NVENC CQP (fixed quantization) CBR (Constant bitrate) CBRHQ (Constant bitrate, high quality) NVENC Split Frame Encoding is a feature introduced in SDK12. SVT-AV1 is essentially incapable of it (it always blurs and scrubs things even at hundreds of megabits, even with VQ As Figure 2 shows, at 1440p and 2160p, NVENC AV1 is 1. The PSNR curve looks to hook upwards from about QP<72 and has a break in gradient at around QP>200. Automatically used when using fast presets (p1-p2 in high quality, p1-p4 in low latency modes) with resolutions above 2160p (UHD/4K). The PSNR curve looks to hook I recently tested SVT vs NVENC with some 1080p60 lossless game capture (just subjective visual comparison), I found NVENC AV1 slowest (preset p7 + multipass fullres) to be worse than GeForce RTX 40 Series GPUs usher in a new era of high-quality streaming with AV1 encoding support on the eighth-generation NVENC. Possibly hold for now until the midrange 40-series come out, as they have dual AV1 encoders that outperform both Intel ARC and AMD's implementations. I haven't tried Handbrake snapshot builds to encode with NVENC AV1 but I'm using NVENC AV1 in OBS to record my games. Good support in editing software. Refer to the NVENC Video Encoder API Programming Guide for more details on this feature. 264/HEVC/AV1 compliant video bit stream. Twitch will enroll participants on a first-come, first-served basis, starting later this month. I've also used NVENC as an intermediate encoding when using Topaz AI (which doesn't have libx264), and then I encode the final thing with libx264. g. While this round-up did not include av1_qsv due to not having an Intel ARC card, the results from av1_nvenc shows the encoder leading all hardware encoders so far, but being limited in bitrate and quality in the CQ mode, while still lagging behind libx265 in most instances. The chart also shows that you can chose AV1 and still gain quality even on the fast settings if you're willing to spend the time. Software encoding is available with SVT-AV1/libaom-av1 but FFmpeg boosts the performance of the NVIDIA NVENC AV1 encoder with a massive gain of 75 to 100%. I made a 30-second clip of multiple sources from slow to very detailed fast-moving snow storms and did +100 versions of it through Handbrake. Recommended settings for the x264 and x265 encoders:. Tune: High Quality or Low Latency or Ultra Low Latency Choose between focusing Quality or (much) lower encoding Latency. That would be great. levels. Reply reply Sounds complicated lol, I actually tested out a few more things and think I'll use SVT AV1. It is actually worse by more than 50%. Adjusting the The conversion from 8-bit to 10-bit happens within the NVENC driver using CUDA for HEVC and HW for AV1. r/AV1 A chip A close button. ) The NVENC plugin in FFMPEG supports the following codecs: h264_nvenc - H264 Encoder hevc_nvenc - HEVC Encoder av1_nvenc - AV1 Encoder The command lines in this document use h264_nvenc, and should be replaced by hevc_nvenc for HEVC encode and av1_nvenc for AV1 encode. You can freely adjust the Key-Frame Interval for anything but Lossless. Another study by Bitmovin confirms these findings, concluding that AV1's video quality was superior to HEVC and VP9 codec when played at the same bitrate settings. On the other hand, AV1, Opus codecs and MKV, WEBM containers are completely free and open source. I am wondering who else is using the AV1 codec and what settings they are using. The AV1 holds up better at lower bitrates and handles 10 bit encodes basically flawlessly. Encoder Preset: Slowest (drag slider to the right) d. Framerate: Same as source & Constant Framerate c. I can only find wrong and/or very superficial tests which say it is "so good" compared to h264. 264 Encode (P1) 19 FPS So far best from a size perspective is AV-QC-30-P3 (CPU), but it would take 30+ hours to complete 2hr runtime. The latest AV1 codec is ~40% more You need a 4000 series GPU and the codec is called av1_nvenc. Sign up for the Twitch Enhanced Broadcasting beta today at twitch. a 20 minute 1440P video ended up being 340 MB in size. Snail. 1. In other words x264 is always better than Nvenc H264. This complexity can lead to slower encoding times when using NVENC with AV1. 264 emerged 15 years ago and has become an ubiquitous video coding standard. Latency tolerant high quality: In these kind of use cases latency is permitted. You can expect coding efficiency gains of 3-4% by enabling high bit-depth encoding and higher for specific sequences. 265/HEVC, the AV1 codec provides greater image quality. Video Quality vs QP at Various Presets. Example: HellDivers 2 4K ultra at native resolution gets me 100-120 Using the dedicated NVENC hardware encoder, streamers can achieve the highest quality video across streaming bitrates, with minimal impact to app and game performance. Excel-Sheet From this computer-generated rating with mainly the mse as criteria, you may come to the conclusion that NVENC is on par with x264 preset=veryfast (the default in OBS), or even a bit better, but unfortunately it isn't. Refer to the SDK release notes for information regarding the required driver NVIDIA GPUs contain an on-chip hardware-accelerated video encoder (NVENC), which provides video encoding for H. It's not really something that the average Virtual Desktop/Link user needs to worry about. nvidia NVENC: Fast but the size of video is doubled & loss of video quality. The 8th-generation Nvidia video encoder, NVENC, is included in the most recent generation of NVIDIA H264 > HEVC > VP9 > AV1 For Quality to Size Efficiency: AV1 > VP9 > HEVC > H264 For lower bitrates, VP9 is worse than HEVC but still slower. My goal is to save space on my stored 4k H264 content, without noticeable quality loss. For NVENC h. AV1 is the best overall format for output due to quality Constant quality mode is only available for Apple Silicon and from ffmpeg 4. NVENC when it comes to quality, and the opposite for file size, encoding time. This results in better overall quality. 264, HEVC and AV1 encoders NVENC Low Level APIs support following features for Turing and later GPUs: ‣ Iterative Encoding: Encode the same frame multiple times with different QP values and without advancing encoder state. 265 (HEVC) For some reason H. Software encoder does, at the cost of 12x longer encoding time (on this particular system I use). RF 18-22 for 480p/576p Standard Definition 1; RF 19-23 for 720p High Definition 2; RF 20-24 for 1080p Full High Definition 3; RF 22-28 for 2160p 4K Ultra High Definition 4; Hi, the current NVENC AV1 "Constant Quality" (CQ) range in HandBrake is 0-51. Still it's very good compared to nvenc 264 and 265 Option Kepler Maxwell Pascal Volta Turing Ampere; Preset: Medium (P4) up to Slowest (P7) As with all encoders, higher presets have diminishing returns for much harsher performance impact. Because of hardware acceleration, AV1 is the fastest and easiest to use, surprisingly. AV1. NVENC HEVC 8-bit, CQ26, slow preset, main profile, auto level v hevc_qsv -profile main -preset slow -global_quality:v 26 -pix_fmt yuv420p \ -c:a copy -c At TwitchCon — a global convention for the Twitch livestreaming platform—livestreamers and content creators this week can experience the latest technologies for accelerating creative workflows and improving video quality. Note the hyphen for H. computerbuster on April 16, 2023 There were multiple mutually incompatible AV1 versions early in development, and some companies chose to not Surprisingly, NvEnc despite lower average quality, has better consistency for RF<20. 265) encoding by 75 to 100%. This software is meant to investigate performance and image quality of HW encoder (NVENC) of NVIDIA. If you have an Nvidia GPU, use the AV1 NVENC encoder for fast Quality Comparison: Both encoding methods deliver high-quality results, with SVT-AV1 having a slight edge in terms of objective quality metrics. I guess when users want the best quality they would probably set the CQ slider all to the right. I have the rtx 4090, fps hit in games us far less with av1. The motivation for hardware encoding is still strong, because of the inordinate amount of CPU I use NVENC and Preset P5: Slow (Good Quality) and for Multipass I use Single Pass. Bit-rate saving for AV1 compared to H. for intel av1, the quality settings dont matter much because the hardware encoder is very fast, but i was testing using a throttle laptop. With AV1-SVT I found that Constant Quality: 30 RF was a nice NVEnc software is meant to investigate performance and image quality of HW encoder (NVENC) of NVIDIA. 0 documentation, this value should theoretically go up to 255. Handbrake 1. So with a throttle CPU it took 12 hours for software, 8 hours for NVIDIA GPUs contain an on-chip hardware-accelerated video encoder (NVENC), which provides video encoding for H. 264. h264, h265: Occupies more space; Av1 & vp9: Was too slow and wasn't able to encode 30sec video in Svt_av1 gave the best quality at same sizes. NVIDIA NVENC Built-In I wanted to get this started and I'll throw in some of my basic code that I've been using for AV1 encodes recently, both with ffmpeg as well as ab-av1, which I've grown to really like. AV1 pushes quality reduction further, to the point where the background suffers: AV1 is indeed designed to push compression efficiency further, but it doesn't inherently mean background quality always suffers. The default is P6, the mediation is high quality, the multi-encoding is 1/4, and the main configuration is The rest can refer to NVIDIA's recommended settings: https://www. 264), HEVC and AV1. SVT is leaps and bounds better quality wise at a certain bitrate and lower, I found at around 2000 kbit/sec @ 1080p and If anything the chart shows why releasers chose M6 to transcode everything. NVIDIA GPUs can run compute workloads on GPU cores independent of NVENC and NVDEC. There’s a video comparison on YouTube. In general, one can trade performance for quality and vice versa. 264, H. nvenc av1 and qsv av1 have very similar vmaf scores at various bitrates on best presets. I was disappointed in how blurry the nvenc h265 encoder gets, nothing Either save some storage for about the same quality, or bump up the quality for about the same file size. 264 and h. 1 or higher, will allow higher bitrates in CQ mode, but for NVENC AV1 there are no encoder levels to select and no workaround to allow higher bitrates when using CQ mode. From an overall quality and performance perspective, Nvidia's latest Ada Lovelace NVENC hardware comes out as the winner with AV1 as the codec of choice, but right now it's only available with So it should probably be NVENC AV1 in your obs settings Edit: you can also change the Preset to P7: Slowest Best Quality (if available) it must be at least 12000. NVENC is absolutely knocking it out of the park on encoding quality. Split Encode (HEVC/AV1 only) Requires NVIDIA Ada Generation GPU with two or more NVENC engines (4070 Ti or higher). For each of these conversions, I used identical settings except I changed the Constant Quality option in HandBrake. 5 mbps, even in CSGO, the quality swings in favour of AV1. There is no AV1 hardware preset for NVEnc. Or a comparison on encoding efficiency compared to intels arc av1 encoding. It's pretty much comparable to HEVC in terms of file size at any given CQP factor and quality varies. AV1 is like 30% faster (I'm monitoring the Video encoder load It's best used as a way to offload CPU usage during streaming and it can't be matched in this regard but I can't take NVenc seriously as a movie archival tool, NVEnc Av1 is marginally better than the outgoing HVEC before it. Speed Trade-off: NVENC encoders are optimized for speed, which might result in slightly larger files or marginally lower quality compared to the best CPU-based encoders. what I'd like to know is the delta. I don’t have a 40 series card myself but I’m sure as they gain adoption people will be looking for that information. NVENC as well as Intel Quicksync are designed more for real time encoding and won't be as bitrate efficient as encoding non-realtime via CPU. The quality of the videos look really good in my opinion. It’s pretty night and day really, with NVENC offering an incredibly blocky image, compared to a still compromised, but considerably sharper image from the ARC card. 264 HEVC AV1 Preset RC Not sure about their videos but I could not achieve the same quality at a limited bandwidth using NVENC vs x264. x265 10-bit is a bit better though if you’re looking for compression and smaller file size. tv/broadcast. 264 (since that is the best Twitch can handle until AV1 comes around), and using H. 264, HEVC (H. A PSNR of 45dB is achieved around QP=48 and 40dB at QP=120. Audio: Codec: E ConstQP Rate Control in AV1_NVENC When using the constqp rate control mode in AV1_NVENC, I’ve noticed that the QP value can only be set between 0 and 51. However using handbrake i can adjust the quality. x264 QuickSync x265 AV1 VP9 & NVENC on the RTX 2080, 2070 and 2060. 45x more efficient than NVENC H. H264 is such an old codec (will be old enough to drink soon)Any AV1 encoder is going to be more bitrate efficient. Reddit /r/hardware is a place for quality computer hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion. VMAF image feature extractors are ported to CUDA, enabling it to consume images that are decoded using In terms of quality, NVENC is your answer. Yeah, some are better than others in some scenarios but it doesn't make a I would lean toward Nvidia still. libx264: Best I can find currently, but is slow. The overall encoding capacity of one NVENC in Turing is comparable to two NVENC’s in Pascal. I think that x265 is the sweet spot. AV1 will by far take the longest, but it will give you a much smaller file size. See: FFmpeg/FFmpeg@aead614. Yes, I am well aware hardware encode is inferior to software encode in terms of quality but I'm mostly just playing around with it. Lossless will (and should) always produce an IDR-Frame every frame. For one Rigaya has great CLI encoders with latest AV1 support NVEnc. Hey, I'm just wondering if there's any update on getting AV1 encoding support into FFmpeg for Nvidia's Ada GPUs (RTX 4090, etc). These tests show how the Tesla T4 performs versus the well-known For -crf replacement from libx264 may be -cq or -qp from h264_nvenc:-crf Select the quality for constant quality mode-cq Set target quality level (0 to 51, 0 means automatic) for constant quality mode in VBR rate control-qp Constant quantization parameter rate control method (from -1 to 51) (default -1). 5 Mbps and 90 points at 6 Mbps — the highest of all the H. But x264 also puts a much bigger load on your system than Nvenc H264. 264 video encoder nvenc nvenc vs amf nvenc vs quicksync nvenc vs vce nvenc vs x264 quicksync Overview Reviews (1) Discussion After far too many requests to updated my previous X264 vs NVENC and NVENC vs AMF/VCE videos with newer AMD drivers, I've finally put together what I consider to be the ultimate package of AV1 lets me max out obs first 4k streaming in full quality without issues. With the new NVIDIA NVENC integration through FFmpeg you can achieve greater recording and stream quality, at no extra expense. I'm using preset 5, but What CRF should I use for 4k 24/30/60fps Content, that is a good balance of visuals and efficiency for reasonable Quality: AV1 and HEVC: Compared to H. And 20 is its default. ( Nvenc HEVC , Nvenc x265) There's like 5 different ways to write the same thing and it differs on each program . Set to 1 to enable Temporal Adaptive Quality, 0 to disable (default). Let’s see how av1_nvenc behaves in QP mode across its presets. Some minor tweaking and AV1-QC32-P6 (NV) is the next best for time and size. 264 and HEVC at better performance. In my experience with NVENC, CPU encoding seems Let’s take a closer look at performance and quality of the new NVENC unit designed into Turing. If I had a 4090, I would definitely record in AV1 because you It might be worth having a look at Hybrid encoder by Selur which has very good hardware encoding for nVidia cards. Intels QSV AV1 encoder is tied to CPU usage, so it may perform worse than x265 would. temporal_aq : boolean 17 votes, 30 comments. I concluded that for this type of media pipeline--high quality sharp slow input, high quality output--AV1 is not useful at all unless you have cycles to burn on a very good processor. But comparing Nvenc AV1 to x264 software there is no contest. Was you able to try anything in 4k out. Splits frame across multiple NVENC engines to achieve higher throughput with near-linear scaling. Commented Feb 20, 2018 at 7:06 @Dr. NVENC hardware’s encoding capabilities can be accessed using the NVENCODE APIs, available in the NVIDIA Video Codec SDK. I'm getting decent encoding times and the quality is really good even at preset 10 with same file size as my Video Encoder: AV1 10-bit (NVEnc) b. At that rate, even if I do multiple jobs at the same time, AOM is terribly terribly slow. In the case of Youtube streaming that accepts AV1, HEVC and AVC, it you only had the ability to stream 1080P60 at 6-8Mbit's AV1 should have a good win, but for an NLE doesn't seem useful given the lower quality of the ⬇️All technical details will be down here⬇️This video was uploaded in 8K to force YouTube to use AV1 on their end. NVIDIA NVENC AV1 offers substantial compression efficiency with respect to H. Encoder features such as B-frames, look-ahead, reference B frames, variable bitrate (VBR) and higher VBV buffer sizes can be used. RF 18-22 for 480p/576p Standard Definition 1; RF 19-23 for 720p High Definition 2; RF 20-24 for 1080p Full High Definition 3; RF 22-28 for 2160p 4K Ultra High Definition 4; It doesn't affect the quality of the video stream at all, it just limits the total number of NVENC sessions you can run simultaneously before encoding performance begins to suffer (and even then instead of impacting image quality it impacts things like encoding speed). Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Ya your CQ for 265 Comparing av1_nvenc with an SVT-AV1 at preset 3-5 at watchable quality (cq 32 against crf 28) size difference is between 25%-40% in my experience, and the quality is less consistent. Fastest hardware accelerated encode method: ffmpeg Hi, I have been looking for days now, but cannot find any tests on how the av1 encoder on nvidia cards performs compared to e. Recording at just 3. The NVIDIA Encoder Interface exposes four different tuning info enums (high quality, low latency, ultra-low Quality: NVENC supports various encoding formats, providing a balance between quality and performance. However the range actually supported by the encoder is 0-63. There's some guides on tuning NVENC for h265 but it seems like they don't exist for AV1 quite yet so I looked through The NVENC plugin in FFMPEG supports the following codecs: h264_nvenc - H264 Encoder hevc_nvenc - HEVC Encoder av1_nvenc - AV1 Encoder The command lines in this document use h264_nvenc, and should be replaced by hevc_nvenc for HEVC encode and av1_nvenc for AV1 encode. SVT-AV1 is great for that sweet spot balance of speed & efficiency for AV1 video. It can also do other things in the encoding process by adding various functions to the hardware encode. it always massively outperformed h264_nvenc in terms of quality for a given bitrate, while also The tool now has the option to utilize AMD's VCN AV1 encoder exclusive to RDNA 3 "Radeon RX 7000" GPUs, as well as NVIDIA's NVENC AV1 encoder featured on GeForce RTX 40 "Ada" GPUs. Download the bitrate 2500 x264 and nvenc video and compare them with your eyes, and you will see more NVENC Split Frame Encoding is a feature introduced in SDK12. With a new series coming out and the current NVENC based on the 2000 series, besides just having av1, is there any data that 103 { "cq", "Set target quality level (0 to 51, 0 means automatic) for constant quality mode in VBR rate control", Shotcut exports AV1 and has a built in quality check functionality. Details on these new presets are available in a dedicated blog post. As Figure 2 shows, at 1440p and 2160p, NVENC AV1 is 1. Same with libx265. Multi NVENC Split Frame Encoding is a feature introduced in SDK12. So equal size but Arc AV1 was every so slightly better quality (VMAF 74 vs 72), but really those VMAF scores are going to have no perceptible difference when viewing. AV1-QC-P (Codec / Constant Quality / Preset ) - Lower # = Better Encoder av1_nvenc [NVIDIA NVENC av1 encoder]: General capabilities: dr1 delay hardware : Threading capabilities: none: Supported hardware devices: cuda cuda d3d11va d3d11va : Supported pixel formats: yuv420p nv12 p010le yuv444p p016le yuv444p16le bgr0 bgra rgb0 rgba x2rgb10le x2bgr10le gbrp gbrp16le cuda d3d11: av1_nvenc AVOptions: I've been comparing Nvenc 265 264, x265, x264, and AV1 SVT while waiting for myArc. Open a short video and export AV1 and export h264. 2. ” Results don’t verify this, performance, at least for h264, is worse when compared to Pascal. Personally, I use HVEC because I'm only running a 3080. Title was edited to remove the clickbait part, and clarify it's mainly a hardware encoder comparison. . 264 encoders at these bit rates. jokbb rikjv xkun wnbdn ytjrbuna fymbl qbwhb mwlpjx leizu pwwn